There isn’t a sugarcoating it: Donald Trump’s victory on Tuesday is a serious setback for a lot of antipoverty insurance policies. With a Republican majority within the Senate (and certain within the Home as nicely), there’s little doubt that spending cuts shall be up for debate, and tried-and-failed concepts like imposing work necessities on welfare recipients shall be again on the desk.
All through the marketing campaign, Trump promised that he wouldn’t minimize Social Safety. However his proposed adjustments to this system — like reducing taxes on Social Safety advantages — would seemingly lead to lowering advantages sooner fairly than later. Different tax-cutting concepts, like his “No Tax on Suggestions” plan, would seemingly be a larger payoff for giant companies than for employees as a result of it may push wages down.
None of meaning, nonetheless, that there’s solely room for pessimism. As my colleague Dylan Matthews wrote, Trump’s first time period confirmed that any main cuts would have a tough time getting handed, even with a Republican majority. And there’s additionally motive to imagine that some packages may even get handed, like some model of an expanded little one tax credit score that has had bipartisan help up to now. (Vice President-elect JD Vance, for instance, has supported increasing the little one tax credit score.)
The election outcomes on Tuesday additionally confirmed indicators of hope — a roadmap for what an antipoverty agenda may appear to be beneath a second Trump presidency. As a result of whereas Democrats misplaced the presidential race, voters didn’t essentially reject their insurance policies. In varied states, voters supported progressive priorities by poll measures, together with minimal wage hikes, paid sick go away, and expanded labor rights. If Democrats need to have a productive 4 years beneath Trump, there’s quite a bit they will do on the state stage — if not within the legislatures, then on the poll field.
One constructive election end result? Voters raised the minimal wage.
In 5 states, voters received to have a say of their minimal wage legal guidelines.
In Missouri, for instance, voters handed a minimal wage hike, elevating it from $12.30 per hour to $15 by 2026. The brand new legislation pegs the minimal wage to inflation, which implies that employees don’t have to attend for an additional legislation to move to maintain up with rising prices. Greater than 562,000 employees will see their wages rise on account of the legislation, based on the Missouri Funds Mission.
Alaskans additionally voted on elevating the minimal wage to $15 per hour, up from $11.73, and the measure is on monitor to move. It will improve earnings for almost 10 p.c of the workforce, based on the Financial Coverage Institute. In California, voters have been requested to lift the state’s minimal wage to $18 per hour, however the outcomes are nonetheless too near name.
In Arizona, voters protected employee pay by overwhelmingly rejecting a measure that may have allowed employers to scale back base wages for tipped employees. In Massachusetts, nonetheless, there was a unique story. Voters didn’t approve a poll measure that may have supported tipped employees. Tipped employees within the state are actually paid $6.75 per hour, however had the measure handed, they’d have ultimately been paid the usual minimal wage, which now sits at $15.
The advantages of a better minimal wage are clear: Staff on the backside mechanically see their incomes rise. However efforts to lift the minimal wage usually face opposition as a result of enterprise pursuits argue that they’d lead to job losses or elevated costs. Within the case of Massachusetts, the proposal was strongly opposed by restaurant lobbying teams.
The proof factors to a unique actuality. In states which have elevated the minimal wage, there was little to no impression on the variety of jobs. Some research have even proven {that a} hike within the minimal wage may result in larger employment in sure labor markets partially as a result of they entice extra employees. And states which have gotten rid of subminimum wages have seen decrease poverty charges amongst tipped employees than states that haven’t.
Latest analysis from the Heart on Wage and Employment Dynamics on the College of California, Berkeley, discovered {that a} larger minimal wage didn’t essentially result in considerably larger costs. After California raised the minimal wage for quick meals employees as much as $20 per hour earlier this 12 months, employment remained steady and costs didn’t dramatically change. In keeping with the examine, widespread menu gadgets have been about 3.7 p.c dearer — a few 15-cent improve for a $4 hamburger.
The subsequent 4 years shall be in regards to the small wins
It’s price noting that in Trump’s first time period, when Democrats had management of the Home, the previous president signed some main antipoverty measures into legislation, together with rental help, boosted unemployment advantages, and stimulus checks. After all, that was prompted by a pandemic, a worldwide catastrophe that we hopefully received’t see a repeat of anytime quickly. In order that sort of coverage on the federal stage is extremely unlikely to move within the subsequent 4 years.
That’s why Democratic lawmakers and antipoverty advocates need to give attention to the state stage to ship significant enhancements to folks’s lives. The poll measures on Tuesday, a few of which additionally included provisions that require employers to supply their employees paid sick go away, confirmed that the general public has an urge for food for insurance policies that would scale back poverty. And whereas voters in Massachusetts rejected abolishing the subminimum wage for tipped employees, they handed a poll measure that permits rideshare drivers to unionize.
Democrats ought to capitalize on that as a result of it will possibly genuinely make a giant distinction. Although the federal minimal wage, which is $7.25 per hour, hasn’t modified in 15 years, at the very least 30 states and Washington, DC, have carried out the next minimal wage.
Generally, main breakthroughs don’t come from one main legislative overhaul from Congress. They can be a sequence of small wins. And we must always take them wherever we will.
This story was featured within the Inside Our Means e-newsletter. Join right here.
