Huang, B. B., Solar, Z. & Solar, G. Latest progress in cathodic reduction-enabled natural electrosynthesis: developments, challenges, and alternatives. eScience 2, 243–277 (2022).
Ruiz, D. A., Ung, G., Melaimi, M. & Bertrand, G. Deprotonation of a borohydride: synthesis of a carbene-stabilized boryl anion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7590–7592 (2013).
Schlapbach, L. & Züttel, A. Hydrogen-storage supplies for cell purposes. Nature 414, 353–358 (2001).
He, T., Pachfule, P., Wu, H., Xu, Q. & Chen, P. Hydrogen carriers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16059 (2017).
Allendorf, M. D. et al. Challenges to growing supplies for the transport and storage of hydrogen. Nat. Chem. 14, 1214–1223 (2022).
Liu, X. J. & Rao, Z. H. Interfacial thermal conductance throughout hexagonal boron nitride & paraffin based mostly thermal vitality storage supplies. J. Power Storage 32, 101860 (2020).
Nicholson, Okay. et al. Boron-catalyzed, diastereo- and enantioselective allylation of ketones with allenes. ACS Catal. 12, 10887–10893 (2022).
Bage, A. D. et al. The hidden function of boranes and borohydrides in hydroboration catalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 13479–13486 (2022).
Mohtadi, R. & Orimo, S. The renaissance of hydrides as vitality supplies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16091 (2017).
Grinderslev, J. B. et al. Methylamine lithium borohydride as electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e2022034 (2022).
Orimo, S., Nakamori, Y., Eliseo, J. R., Züttel, A. & Jensen, C. Advanced hydrides for hydrogen storage. Chem. Rev. 107, 4111–4132 (2007).
Zhang, W. X. et al. Latest growth of lithium borohydride-based supplies for hydrogen storage. Adv. Power Maintain. Res. 2, 2100073 (2021).
Züttel, A. et al. Hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 356–357, 515–520 (2003).
Shao, J. Low-temperature reversible hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4: a synergetic impact of nanoconfinement and nanocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 11252–11260 (2014).
Li, C., Peng, P., Zhou, D. W. & Wan, L. Analysis progress in LiBH4 for hydrogen storage: a evaluate. Int. J. Hydrogen Power 36, 14512–14526 (2011).
Orimo, S. & Züttel, A. Dehydriding and rehydriding reactions of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 404–406, 427–430 (2005).
He, T., Cao, H. J. & Chen, P. Advanced hydrides for vitality storage, conversion, and utilization. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902757 (2019).
Friedrichs, O. et al. Low-temperature synthesis of LiBH4 by gas-solid response. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 5531–5534 (2009).
Fakioǧlu, E., Yürüm, Y. & Veziroǧlu, T. N. A evaluate of hydrogen storage programs based mostly on boron and its compounds. Int. J. Hydrogen Power 29, 1371–1376 (2004).
Puszkiel, J., Gasnier, A., Amica, G. & Gennari, F. Tuning LiBH4 for hydrogen storage: destabilization, additive, and nanoconfinement approaches. Molecules 25, 163 (2020).
Qu, S. Q. et al. Superior reversible hydrogen storage in eutectic LiBH4–KBH4 system through Ni–based mostly catalysts synergized with graphene. Mater. Right now Catal. 9, 100105 (2025).
Fan, Y. P., Chen, D. D., Liu, X. Y., Fan, G. X. & Liu, B. Z. Enhancing the hydrogen storage efficiency of lithium borohydride by Ti3C2 MXene. Int. J. Hydrogen Power 44, 29297–29303 (2019).
Pang, Y. C., Hu, X. C., Zhang, X. Y., Yu, X. B. & Xia, G. L. Two-dimensional transition metal-based high-entropy oxide nanoplates for enhanced hydrogen storage of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 1040, 183613 (2025).
Ding, Z., Li, H. & Shaw, L. New insights into the solid-state hydrogen storage of nanostructured LiBH4-MgH2 system. Chem. Eng. J. 385, 123856 (2020).
Zhang, X. et al. Single-pot solvothermal technique towards support-free nanostructured LiBH4 that includes 12 wt% reversible hydrogen storage at 400 °C. Chem. Eng. J. 428, 132566 (2022).
Le, T. T. et al. Nanoconfinement results on hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 and LiBH4. Int. J. Hydrogen Power 46, 23723–23736 (2021).
Wan, X. F. & Shaw, L. Novel dehydrogenation properties derived from nanoscale LiBH4. Acta Mater. 59, 4606–4615 (2011).
Li, S., Willis, M. & Jena, P. Response intermediates in the course of the dehydrogenation of steel borohydrides: a cluster perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 16849–16854 (2010).
Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Discovering optimum floor websites on heterogeneous catalysts by counting nearest neighbors. Science 350, 185–189 (2015).
Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Quick prediction of adsorption properties for platinum nanocatalysts with generalized coordination numbers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8316–8319 (2014).
Shang, L., Xu, J. & Nienhaus, G. U. Latest advances in synthesizing steel nanocluster-based nanocomposites for utility in sensing, imaging and catalysis. Nano Right now 28, 100767 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Nano-synergy permits extremely reversible storage of 9.2 wt% hydrogen at gentle situations with lithium borohydride. Nano Power 83, 105839 (2021).
Zhang, J. G. et al. Nickel-decorated graphene nanoplates for enhanced H2 sorption properties of magnesium hydride at reasonable temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2560–2570 (2016).
Liu, J. C. et al. Synergistic impact of rGO supported Ni3Fe on hydrogen storage efficiency of MgH2. Int. J. Hydrogen Power 45, 16622–16633 (2020).
Bhatnagar, A. et al. Fe3O4@graphene as a superior catalyst for hydrogen de/absorption from/in MgH2/Mg. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 14761–14772 (2016).
Johnson, W. A. & Mehl, R. F. Response kinetics in processes of nucleation and development. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petro. Eng. 135, 416–442 (1939).
Avrami, M. Granulation, section change, and microstructure kinetics of section change. III. J. Chem. Phys. 9, 177–184 (1941).
Kempen, A. T. W., Sommer, F. & Mittemeijer, E. J. Willpower and interpretation of isothermal and non-isothermal transformation kinetics; the efficient activation energies when it comes to nucleation and development. J. Mater. Sci. 37, 1321–1332 (2002).
Fu, Z. M., Yang, B. W. & Wu, R. Q. Understanding the exercise of single-atom catalysis from frontier orbitals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 156001 (2020).
Łodziana, Z., Błoński, P., Yan, Y. G., Rentsch, D. & Remhof, A. NMR chemical shifts of 11B in steel borohydrides from first-principle calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 6594–6603 (2014).
Mauron, P. et al. Stability and reversibility of LiBH4. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 906–910 (2008).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Effectivity of ab-initio complete vitality calculations for metals and semiconductors utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Environment friendly iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, Okay. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made easy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate within the nudged elastic band methodology for locating minimal vitality paths and saddle factors. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985 (2000).
Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. A dimer methodology for locating saddle factors on excessive dimensional potential surfaces utilizing solely first derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7010–7022 (1999).
Nelson, R. et al. LOBSTER: native orbital projections, atomic expenses, and chemical-bonding evaluation from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional principle. J. Comput. Chem. 41, 1931–1940 (2020).
Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. Crystal orbital Hamilton inhabitants (COHP) evaluation as projected from plane-wave foundation units. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 5461–5466 (2011).
Dronskowski, R. & Bloechl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based mostly on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).
Smidstrup, S. et al. QuantumATK: an built-in platform of digital and atomic-scale modelling instruments. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 015901 (2019).
