Ought to verified identities change into the usual on-line? Australia’s social media ban for under-16s exhibits why the query issues.
14 Jan 2026
•
,
5 min. learn
New laws in Australia makes it unlawful for these underneath 16 to have a social media account. To keep away from monetary penalties, social media corporations have scrambled to take away accounts they consider breach the laws. Notably, there aren’t any penalties for the under-16s who try and create an account utilizing a fraudulent age. As the primary nation to introduce such a ban, Australia has change into a little bit of a check case: the world is watching to see how efficient the laws is and whether or not it produces the specified outcomes.
As 2026 has simply begun, this additionally sparks a broader query for web customers and regulators alike: will this be the yr the world rethinks id on-line?
The established order doesn’t work – what’s going to?
Whereas Australia’s new age guidelines are rooted in considerations over the well-documented dangers kids face on social media platforms, the necessity to change the expertise of social media might be not greatest served by banning it completely. The underlying points stay. As soon as somebody turns 16, is it all of a sudden acceptable to topic them to the problems they’ve been shielded from? Certainly all folks ought to be protected against dangerous content material, abuse and different adverse expertise. Historical past additionally means that banning one thing causes larger demand. I bear in mind from my very own youth when radio stations banned the likes of “Calm down” by Frankie Goes to Hollywood – the ban simply made everybody take heed to it extra and helped maintain the observe at primary within the charts for longer. Denial fuels demand, and on this occasion it might exacerbate the problem of on-line risks as these underneath 16 in Australia search for alternate options.
In the meantime, age-verification laws in numerous different nations and in some U.S. states can be making an attempt to restrict entry to grownup content material, bringing about quite a few age-verification applied sciences on web sites that want to limit their content material. Some applied sciences supply real-time age dedication based mostly on facial options whereas others depend on extra formal methods, utilizing government-issued identification or monetary paperwork. All of those approaches can create further privateness considerations, particularly round information assortment and storage.
Add into this combine the likes of phishing emails, romance scams, monetary fraud and all the opposite numerous ways in which cybercriminals and fraudsters try and dupe their victims, and it could elevate the query: is the way in which that web companies and apps work as we speak nonetheless match for objective?
Additionally, think about being advised 30 years in the past that sooner or later a small system in your pocket would permit you to connect with nearly anybody from anyplace, work together, store, make reservations, watch TV on demand. However alongside these cool options in your telephone, there’s additionally the power to bully others and be as abusive as you need with out accountability, and even stay nameless when doing so – or, certainly, be on the receiving finish of such habits. When thought of on this method, you may need thought of not having one among these units.
The abuser subsequent door
There could also be an assumption that abusive or undesirable habits on the web comes from some place else: it’s not your neighbor, not somebody you already know, not even somebody out of your city – it’s most likely Russian bots or somebody from afar. Nonetheless, a latest BBC investigation discovered that in only one weekend there have been 2,000 extraordinarily abusive social media posts directed at managers and gamers within the Premier League and Girls’s Tremendous League, with some being so excessive as to contain threats of loss of life and rape. Figuring out the people behind the acute posts is unlikely as there isn’t any formal identification wanted when creating social media accounts, and utilizing a VPN makes monitoring troublesome.
Until an app or service is operated by a regulated firm that requires id verification, individuals are free to create accounts on many companies utilizing any id they need. This selection for anonymity has been a core idea of freedom on the web, though whether or not this was by design is questionable. The barrier for constructive identification when creating an account is that companies might in the end have fewer customers – it could introduce friction at account creation, one thing that corporations counting on consumer numbers to ship adverts and sponsored content material need to keep away from.
This results in a broader query: Is it time for a normal acceptance that the web must have verified, authenticated customers?
I’m not suggesting that every one companies have to have verified customers. Nonetheless, if I might change off content material, posts and communication makes an attempt from non-verified customers, then my on-line expertise may enhance considerably. The soccer managers and gamers within the Premier League could possibly be on social media with out being subjected to the torrent of trash and abuse they see as we speak, and if a verified consumer makes an excessive menace they may face the results of legislation enforcement. Extending this idea in order that under-16s might solely work together with content material from verified customers might not utterly clear up the problems of as we speak, however doubtless solutions the 80/20 rule of eradicating 80% of the problems.
The advantages should not restricted to social media. At current, my electronic mail inbox has the choice to separate normal mailing listing electronic mail from electronic mail messages that want motion. Introducing a 3rd filter for unverified senders would additionally assist winnow away attainable spear-phishing and focused assaults. There may be, in fact, the danger of cybercriminals hijacking verified accounts, so this isn’t a silver bullet. It does, nonetheless, add one other layer of safety.
Verified doesn’t equate to seen
Crucially, id verification doesn’t take away the choice of defending id. For instance, a courting platform might confirm the id of all of the subscribers however nonetheless permit them to tackle any profile id they select. The safety is available in realizing that each member on the platform has been verified as an actual individual and their id is understood to the platform. Any abuse or fraud is then attributable to the person, permitting the suitable authorities to take motion.
Shifting to an web that distinguishes between verified and non-verified people can be an enormous reset of the established order. Claims about limitations of freedom of speech would observe whereas corporations counting on consumer numbers to reveal development may even have to reset their valuations. Nonetheless, the idea of verified identities doesn’t silence speech or prohibit freedom. What it does is give folks the choice to filter out the noise and abuse originating from the unverified.
One factor is for sure: the present strategies of limiting content material by age should not resolving the problem of undesirable, abusive or unlawful content material. And in relation to these being prohibited from utilizing social media, the measures are more likely to push a few of them underground or drive them to avoid the restrictions, which is able to doubtlessly be extra harmful and enhance danger, reasonably than lowering it.
