Does your small business really perceive its dependencies, and the right way to mitigate the dangers posed by an assault on them?
12 Aug 2025
•
,
4 min. learn
A panel dialogue at DEF CON 33 final week, titled “Adversaries at conflict: Techniques, applied sciences, and classes from fashionable battlefields”, supplied a number of thought-provoking factors, in addition to a transparent takeaway: whereas digital techniques resembling misinformation and affect campaigns are helpful in fashionable battle, they don’t seem to be going to win a conflict. That’s as a result of when bombs begin dropping and the bodily parts of conflict are underneath manner, the misinformation spreading by digital channels turns into much less necessary. Understandably, the victims of battle and people displaced have extra pressing priorities: meals, shelter and staying alive.
Turning the dialog as to if a conflict may very well be received utilizing cyberattacks and digital disruption, there was additionally settlement among the many panelists that cyberattacks create momentary injury, whereas a bomb touchdown on one thing is a simpler and lasting methodology of destruction.
The assaults in opposition to crucial infrastructure in Ukraine doubtlessly verify this: Russia-aligned actors have launched quite a few cyberattacks in opposition to the nation’s energy grid, leading to momentary disruptions as techniques will be rebuilt and made operational once more in a comparatively quick time period. In the meantime, a bomb touchdown on an influence facility is prone to trigger long-term injury and limitation of service that might take months or years to revive. The large-picture conclusion on this a part of the panel dialogue is {that a} conflict can’t be received by cyber alone – it nonetheless must be received on the bodily battlefield.
Cyber and bodily safety
The dialogue then developed to how cyber impacts the bodily. One panelist made the remark to the impact that “a military can’t struggle in the event that they haven’t been fed”. Put in another way, as a rising variety of civilian contractors are getting used to offer the logistics wanted to function a military, making the assault floor broader than it could seem.
The panel used Taco Bell as a fictional analogy. A hacker might declare they modified the water provide in Taco Bell, however on nearer inspection it might simply be that they’ve tampered with a restaurant’s water cooler, which might not be sufficient to have an effect on its operations.
Nonetheless, a cyberattack on Taco Bell’s provide chain might carry it to an operational cease. How? By stopping deliveries of produce to the restaurant. This dependency may very well be much more obscure: an assault on the businesses that offer the meat utilized in Tacos might doubtlessly trigger Taco Bell to stop operations on account of a scarcity of elements for meals. The analogy holds true for the army: with out meals, the troops can’t struggle or are, at finest, restricted.
What this implies for your small business
Transferring past the panel dialogue, this raises a crucial query for companies: do they actually perceive their dependencies to be operationally resilient? Do they perceive the dependency their prospects have on them to make sure the continued operation of their very own companies?
Sticking with the Taco Bell analogy, think about a cyberattack that takes away a key aspect the enterprise must function; for instance, if the corporate depends on a provider for taco seasoning, then a cyberattack in opposition to the provider might have an effect on Taco Bell’s capacity to maintain working. This isn’t mere hypothesis – there are real-world examples of cyberattacks which have brought on such a disruption. For instance, the cyber-incident suffered by Change Healthcare, a well being knowledge processing agency, stopped medical companies being supplied throughout practices and hospitals.
Right this moment, so far as I do know, cybercriminals solely extort cost from these they instantly assault. However what if a cybercriminal determined to assault the third celebration after which demand an extortion cost from all the companies that depend on that provider? In my instance, say the taco seasoning firm is disrupted by ransomware, and whereas the cybercriminal might ask the seasoning firm to pay a requirement instantly, they might truly achieve extra in the event that they requested cost from all the businesses reliant on the provider’s product, as a scarcity of provide might value them greater than the provider itself.
Whereas this monetization technique could appear speculative, there is a vital level right here: does your small business really perceive its dependencies and the right way to mitigate the danger of assault on these it’s depending on? An actual-world instance is likely to be an assault on a catering firm that’s contracted to feed sufferers in a hospital. If the flexibility to feed sufferers is disrupted on account of a cyberattack, then the hospital might need to declare a serious incident and shut admissions to new sufferers. On this situation, would the hospital pay an extortion demand that brings again catering provide?
The important thing takeaway from this panel session for me is that this: all of us must map and absolutely perceive the dependencies we depend on and guarantee we now have resilience the place wanted. If we will’t get to some extent of resilience, then we at the very least want to grasp the danger posed by the dependencies.
