This story was initially printed in The Spotlight, Vox’s member-exclusive journal. To get early entry to member-exclusive tales each month, be part of the Vox Membership program immediately.
For millennials in all places, two of probably the most glamorous and terrifying fashionistas of the 2000s had been the hosts of TLC’s What To not Put on, Stacy London and Clinton Kelly. London’s Cruella streak of white hair, Kelly’s herringbone fits — the polish! The fabulousness! The best way they might cackle over a hapless sufferer’s mother denims and dated ’80s perm earlier than actually throwing their complete wardrobe within the rubbish — properly, the meanest eighth-grader you recognize must work exhausting to be that scary.
What was most compelling of all about London and Kelly, although, was the concept they may really let you know what to not put on: that there have been actual, inflexible guidelines to vogue, and you possibly can study them, in case you paid shut sufficient consideration. You may study to put on what was acceptable on your age, your career, your physique; to attract consideration away from the most important a part of your physique and towards the smallest; to place collectively a wise blazer with a enterprise informal wrap gown, irrespective of the event.
What To not Put on led to 2013 after 10 years on the air, and Kelly and London have each since distanced themselves from the model. Final summer time, nonetheless, they introduced that they might be reuniting to host a brand new present on Amazon Prime, one far faraway from the height of 2000s physique shaming: Put on Regardless of the F You Need.
“The world has modified loads because the run of ‘What To not Put on’, and, fortunately, so have we. Lately, we have now zero curiosity in telling folks what to do, based mostly on society’s norms — as a result of there aren’t any extra norms!” they stated in a press launch. “It’s time to have fun particular person type, not prescribe it.”
In some way, the ethos London and Kelly had been making an attempt to broadcast for his or her new present has turn out to be the prevailing perspective within the type recommendation world now. Celebrating particular person type, fairly than prescribing it, is the brand new crucial. The phrase that individuals — or no less than the hundreds of influencers who’ve supplanted vogue’s common gatekeepers during the last 20 years — often use is “discovering your private type,” they usually seed it liberally within the titles of TikToks and YouTube movies and Instagram reels. As in: “Outfits I wore earlier than I discovered my private type,” “Ted speak on private type,” “The best way to discover your private type.”
It felt as inaccessible as the concept I may theoretically make a mid-career pivot to appearing and win an Oscar.
I first began seeing the phrase in all places round 2021, simply as we had been rising from pandemic lockdowns, and it felt like stumbling throughout a mystical and arcane idea: that my private type existed someplace on the market, unbiased of my acutely aware thoughts, and all I needed to do was get in contact with the instruments I wanted to seek out it.
Trend-wise, I’m what the children would name a normie. I’m not often sloppy, however I ceaselessly really feel that my garments may look higher. Imagining that I may have a way of my very own type so exact and particular that I may describe it with phrases, may know at a look if an article of clothes belonged to it — properly, it felt as inaccessible as the concept I may theoretically make a mid-career pivot to appearing and win an Oscar. Positive, it’s technically bodily potential, however what are the chances?
Nonetheless, I used to be intrigued. The dialogue about discovering your private type comes with such intriguing guarantees. The TikTok influencers and YouTube vloggers say discovering yours will prevent from falling sufferer to developments and the accusations of basicness that include them. It is going to prevent from losing your cash on garments that you simply don’t like, or from contributing to the mountains of calmly used textiles that clog landfills. It’s an concept that I discover profoundly seductive — and, as a result of it’s so seductive, I additionally discover myself profoundly suspicious of it.
When did all of us get so obsessive about private type, anyway?
On the outset of this decade, as quick vogue and TikTok converged, the pattern cycle began to maneuver very quick certainly. An abbreviated checklist of the kinds which have risen and fallen and maybe risen once more in the previous couple of years: pleated skirts, mini skirts, midi skirts; cardigans, ladyjackets, puffer jackets, trench coats; prairie clothes, maxi clothes, shift clothes; high-waisted pants, low-rise denims, barrel cuts, boot cuts, flared trousers; tucked-in sweaters, crop tops, bralettes; lug-soled loafers, knee-high boots, platform sneakers, gladiator sandals, and so forth., and so forth.
A part of the rationale the thought of discovering your private type gained such foreign money is that it presents an antidote to this impossibly frenetic cycle. “It bubbled up first for me on TikTok and social media,” says Rachel Tashjian, vogue critic for the Washington Publish. “Individuals would say, ‘Okay, I’m getting actually fed up with all of those micro developments.’ The response to that’s to say, ‘Don’t comply with these developments, however as an alternative discover your private type.’”
A kind of making the argument that it’s each extra personally fulfilling and sustainable to get off the pattern treadmill is Alyssa Beltempo, a sluggish vogue stylist and YouTube content material creator. “When you recognize what you like, it’s loads more durable to be swayed by what’s new and what’s trending,” Beltempo says. What she means is that when you might have a way of style divorced from the pattern of the hour, you can be much less tempted to purchase a $20 polyester ruched milkmaid gown from Shein the following time cottagecore vogue blows up on TikTok, put on it as soon as, after which throw it out.
Physique-positive stylist Dacy Gillespie, who runs the favored vogue substack Unflattering, theorizes that the motion towards physique positivity itself has performed a job within the social shift that has folks reexamining what they need from their garments. If we’re in a position to placed on our garments with out demanding they make us look as skinny as potential, Gillespie argues, many new prospects open up earlier than us.
“I see that lots of people are considering extra about self-expression versus what’s ‘flattering’ or what we must always put on,” Beltempo says. “Each worlds do nonetheless exist, however there’s undoubtedly been a shift.”
Or perhaps there’s a extra pragmatic rationalization for the massive shift in how we speak about garments: the rise of stretchy materials like Lycra and Spandex.
“It’s nearly as dramatic as once they removed corsets.”
— David Kibbe, private stylist behind Kibbe picture identities
“Within the outdated days, the silhouette was structured outdoors the physique,” says David Kibbe, the non-public stylist behind the vastly internet-famous phenomenon of Kibbe picture identities. “A silhouette often got here from Paris, and it will change about as soon as a decade” — therefore the long-lasting ’40s shoulder pads and ’50s nipped-in waists.
Then got here the ’80s, when new expertise started to make it potential for material to stretch across the pure type of the physique, fairly than construct new shapes on high of it. Right now, practically all garments are produced from light-weight and stretchy cloth, and the silhouette is now not swapped out as soon as a decade by Parisian designers. As a substitute, it’s the product of the way in which a person piece of clothes drapes round a person physique. “That modifications every little thing,” Kibbe says. “It’s nearly as dramatic as once they removed corsets.”
Now, says Tashjian, vogue designers who used to subject edicts on what folks ought to put on are starting to speak about their work as being in service to the artistic imaginative and prescient of the patron.
“I used to be actually shocked to listen to designers backstage speaking about, ‘It’s actually not about what I’m creating. It’s about giving this stuff to girls, they usually can put them collectively in fascinating methods,’” Tashjian says. “We’re used to considering of designers as dictators.”
Modifications in cloth expertise made it potential for customers to consider garments in new methods, specializing in their very own needs as an alternative of the alternatives of a designer. Social media made it potential to speak about these ideas in massive teams. A rising progressive ethos of environmentalism and physique positivity made it ever-more engaging to domesticate your individual type. Now, it’s all that appears to matter on the subject of garments.
The warring philosophies of favor
After I first began taking note of the thought of private type, it was towards the tip of the Covid lockdowns. I wasn’t fully certain how I wished to decorate, however after I checked out my outdated closet filled with prim enterprise informal clothes I assumed: “Not this.”
I wished to know what regarded good on my physique. I wished to not care if I regarded skinny. I wished to really feel contemporary and fashionable. I wished to not get slowed down in developments. I wished a number of garments that had been new and thrilling. I wished to not spend my cash on quick vogue. I wished to reply to nobody, and I wished somebody to elucidate clearly to me how everybody was dressing as of late in order that I’d know what the benchmark was.
Like many individuals who like garments, guidelines, and esoteric idea, I discovered what felt like a potential reply to my inconceivable drawback with Kibbe styling, invented by Kibbe and immortalized by his first e book Metamorphosis in 1987.
Over the previous 10 years, the Kibbe system has turn out to be the organizing precept for a thriving web subculture with subreddits and Fb teams and TikTok movies — to nobody’s shock as a lot as Kibbe himself, who says he discovered about his fan base when one in every of his shoppers informed him he ought to search his identify on Fb. Now, it’s widespread sufficient that Kibbe has launched an up to date and revised tackle his system, David Kibbe’s Energy of Type.
Kibbe’s system has a quasi-mystical attract partially as a result of it’s so befuddling to determine; it’s a little bit like diving deep into astrology. It accommodates ten picture archetypes, and also you type your self into them based mostly on the way in which cloth drapes round your physique. If it falls in straight, vertical folds, you might be Dramatic; if it skims over you in lush, spherical curves, you might be Romantic; in case you fall someplace in between, there’s a unique sort on the market for you. Every sort, in flip, will get really useful a unique type vibe based mostly on Previous Hollywood archetypes. Regal Dramatics are purported to look greatest in structured tailoring, like Lauren Bacall, whereas dreamy Romantics are purported to look greatest in soft-edged, flowing garments, like Marilyn Monroe.
Kibbe additionally types his shoppers into shade seasons to determine which colours look greatest on them — heat vs. cool, smooth vs. vibrant. By the point his course of is completed, the idea goes, you recognize precisely what shapes and colours flatter you, and you may ignore every little thing that doesn’t. In a market thrown into hyperdrive by quick vogue, that’s a gorgeous thought.
“Private type is tough to seek out,” says Vanessa Friedman, vogue director and chief vogue critic on the New York Instances. “Being acutely aware of it opens up a complete bunch of questions that you simply then should ask your self about the way you’re presenting your self and why you’re presenting your self that manner and the way you are feeling each morning. That takes time, after which you can begin getting neurotic about whether or not you’re doing it incorrect. So providing pointers like seasons and shapes and all that may be a method to form of take among the neurosis or the insecurity out of it.”
I’m naturally skeptical of physique typing programs, however I favored that Kibbe doesn’t appear to significantly care about making anybody look skinny. He talks loads about “honoring” the distinctive attributes of every sort, about making broad shoulders look broader and tall frames look taller.
Kibbe’s system has a quasi-mystical attract partially as a result of it’s so befuddling to determine; it’s a little bit like diving deep into astrology.
After I discovered concerning the system, I spent months squinting neurotically at folks’s shoulders, making an attempt to show myself to see the attribute Kibbe describes as “width.” Finally, after wanting backwards and forwards sufficient instances between my very own shoulders and Carole Lombard’s, I decided that I used to be a Delicate Pure, the identical group wherein Kibbe has hilariously positioned such disparate figures as Jennifer Lopez, Helen Mirren, and Kamala Harris.
Discovering my Kibbe sort was a profoundly gratifying train, not least as a result of numerous the garments he really useful for Delicate Naturals had been trending on the time. If my bias-cut slip clothes and slouchy cropped cardigans had been sending a message, the message stated that I used to be younger, lived in a metropolis, and knew what regarded good on me.
But on the identical time, I felt ambivalent concerning the thought of fixating on particular elements of my physique, even when it was simply to determine the perfect methods to point out them off, and on the thought of constructing my garments “flattering,” which in spite of everything continues to be most frequently code for making your self look as skinny as potential. There most likely existed, I felt, a way of partaking with type that was extra mental, purely about what you might be drawn to aesthetically — so the true deprogramming may start. The physique optimistic and physique impartial elements of the web appeared like a very good place to begin.
“After I work with shoppers, we spend one complete hour simply speaking about their relationship to garments over the course of their lives, beginning with once they had been younger and once they acquired messages about what they need to put on,” says Gillespie, the physique optimistic stylist. “It’s typically physique associated.” You may make a complete profession out of educating folks to drop all of the racist, misogynistic baggage we’re all carrying round with our garments.
Even folks in supposedly “splendid” our bodies will most likely bear in mind being informed that there have been sure garments that wouldn’t work on them. However our tradition has a very particular slew of guidelines for fats folks: telling them to not put on horizontal stripes that might make them look wider, or vibrant colours that make them stand out, or tight garments that cling to their flesh. One in all Gillespie’s objectives is to assist her shoppers study to tune that recommendation out, after which determine methods to make their aesthetic desires sensible, to “translate it into one thing that works for them within the society that we stay in.”
Gillespie factors me to the instance of the traditional recommendation for a pear-shaped individual — put on fitted garments on high that cinch the waist, and one thing looser and flowier on the underside. “For those who simply consider that silhouette in your thoughts, that’s such a girly female silhouette. What if that’s not your vibe?” Gillespie asks. “What in case you love an outsized androgynous look or one thing? To me that’s a very good rationalization of how dressing to flatter your physique may fully derail you from listening to what you really need to put on.”
It’s for that reason that Gillespie is inherently suspicious of stylists like Kibbe. Kibbe, in the meantime, sees no level in counting the form of your physique out of the equation once you’re getting dressed, any greater than he would rely out the load of the material.
“All the pieces comes right down to self love and finally self acceptance,” Kibbe informed me. “I completely suppose it’s best to love what you put on. That’s actually essential.” Nonetheless, he provides, if you wish to make that androgynous silhouette that you simply love work in your physique, it’s important to perceive the foundations of how cloth interacts together with your precise, bodily form. Impact depends on approach, and with out it, “then that fantasy stays in your head. So I imagine in integration, the interior and the outer.”
There’s a 3rd college of thought right here, nonetheless, that doesn’t simply take into consideration type as a type of artwork and expression, however as a type of cultural communication. Garments include context, and we depend on them to inform strangers issues about us.
Derek Man, a menswear blogger and social media energy person, argues that having good type means understanding the cultural guidelines of clothes as if it’s a grammar. For Man, utilizing programs like Kibbe’s to information your gown selections can imply making nonsense out of your garments’ cultural grammar, particularly within the rigidly codified world of menswear. (“I don’t know something about womenswear,” he says as a caveat.)
Take, as an illustration, the observe of males sporting grey or navy fits to the workplace in the event that they work in conventional fields like legislation and finance. “That’s due to the legacy of British cultural practices: grey and navy had been worn within the workplace in London to do enterprise, and brown and olive had been worn within the nation for sport,” Man says.
This observe clashes with the seasonal shade system Kibbe and different shade analysts use, below which grey and navy are cool-toned colours that solely folks with cool-toned pores and skin ought to put on. I actually am a heat autumn, which suggests I would want to hunt out olive or brown businesswear — which, based on Man, could not “convey the seriousness of enterprise.” (Actually information we are able to use in digital media, the place folks often take conferences of their sweatpants.)
“To me, all these concepts of dressing on your pores and skin tone and physique sort are primarily making an attempt to make what’s cultural language look like some sort of pseudo-scientific endeavor, when it’s actually tradition that drives how we gown,” Man says.
Skinny denims and the pattern paradox
Even in spite of everything that deep diving into type programs, even being cautious to disregard the microtrends and TikTok core of the week, I couldn’t get away from the sense that each time I acquired dressed, I used to be nonetheless being pushed and buffeted by one thing outdoors of myself. I discovered a pair of thin denims from 2016 behind a drawer and couldn’t cease gazing them, at how incorrect they regarded to me, how essentially incorrect. I couldn’t imagine I had ever worn something so tight, so constricting across the ankles.
But I had worn such denims on an nearly every day foundation for nearly a decade and thought nothing of it. Why did they give the impression of being so incorrect now? Had I gotten so in contact with my very own aesthetic preferences that I now realized I had by no means actually favored them? Did they conflict with the strains of my Delicate Pure physique? Have been they talking a cultural language I wasn’t occupied with? Or was it merely that even in spite of everything that work, my sense of favor was nonetheless below the management of the good cultural tide of developments?
Man’s take is that in case you perceive the cultural language of your pants, you possibly can nonetheless pull off skinny denims simply superb. He factors to the mannequin and stylist Knowledge Kaye, who has been posting movies of himself rocking the now-reviled skinny jean to social media.
“For those who take a look at the outfits that he’s creating, what do all of them depend on when it comes to social language? Effectively, all of them are counting on this rock’n’roll aesthetic,” Man says. “So in case your aesthetic inspiration is Seventies and ’80s rock ’n’ roll guys, you’re clearly not going to put on actually broad leg pants, as a result of that’s not the look. You’re going to put on skinny denims. Aspect zip boots, flannels, black leather-based jackets. … That’s the look that was created by way of social historical past and can proceed to be cool, as a result of that’s the look of the Ramones, of Sid Vicious. The best way that it goes dangerous is when guys begin to put on skinny chinos with an workplace shirt.”
In distinction, Kibbe argues for taking note of developments to a sure extent, after which deciphering them in a manner that works on your picture identification. “There ought to by no means be a subservience of favor to pattern or to vogue,” he says. “It’s best to use these issues in service of your star.” Then he added in barely enigmatic tones, “A rosebud could be very stunning, however it’s most stunning of all when it’s in bloom.”
Gillespie, in the meantime, suggests wanting on the drawback of thin denims by way of the sensible lens of your individual life. “I’ll all the time attempt to encourage folks to consider, in case you’re feeling pressured to offer your skinny denims up: Why do you want them?” she says. “Do they serve a particular operate for you? For no matter purpose, do you want having cloth near your legs? Do you bike to work? Then I would like you to think about all these issues, after which reject the concept says that skinny denims look incorrect, since you’re making that call for your self.”
Then again, is there something extra banal than not feeling like a person in 2025? The vloggers and Substackers who speak about private type on a regular basis are filled with this criticism. “It’s prefer it must be in a science fiction novel,” says Tashjian of the plethora of essays on this topic. “How is it that I’m studying again and again, in some situations phrase for phrase, ‘It’s so exhausting to be a person as of late.’ And you then scroll a little bit bit: ‘It’s getting more and more troublesome to be a person as of late.’”
To be fully your self: That’s the fantasy of discovering your type. To exist inside the entire weird construction of vogue — all these billionaires deciding what it’s best to put on, all these entrepreneurs deciding how it’s best to really feel about your one human physique, all these supplies that can lie subsequent to your pores and skin for some days after which rot endlessly in a landfill, all these individuals who will see you day by day and make their assumptions about you based mostly on the way you look — and to really feel that you simply’ve acquired some company when you’re in there.
However the countless grind of capitalism has a manner of turning all criticisms about our overconsumption into a brand new manner of promoting you issues. If one of many weaknesses of our present vogue market is that it’s hawking you stylish plastic garments you wouldn’t in any other case need and can quickly should discard, and the way in which out is to get in contact with your individual aesthetic needs — properly, there are methods to monetize that journey, too.
I don’t know if we are able to ever discover our individuality by way of our garments. I did study that I don’t actually like crew necks, although.
